<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hierarchy and Leadership in Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://khlo.co.uk/index.php/hierarchy-and-leadership-in-society/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://khlo.co.uk/index.php/hierarchy-and-leadership-in-society</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shimul</title>
		<link>http://khlo.co.uk/index.php/hierarchy-and-leadership-in-society/comment-page-1#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>Shimul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/hierarchy-and-leadership-in-society#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>does leadership come from gene or it can be achieved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does leadership come from gene or it can be achieved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Slater</title>
		<link>http://khlo.co.uk/index.php/hierarchy-and-leadership-in-society/comment-page-1#comment-3250</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/hierarchy-and-leadership-in-society#comment-3250</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post. I must call you up on your language though. I think most biologists no longer follow the idea of group selection.

Surely selection works at the gene level. So a gene which causes some individuals to be leaders and some to be followers would benefit both groups and do well at the lottery of reproduction. 

Groups don't breed, individuals do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post. I must call you up on your language though. I think most biologists no longer follow the idea of group selection.</p>
<p>Surely selection works at the gene level. So a gene which causes some individuals to be leaders and some to be followers would benefit both groups and do well at the lottery of reproduction. </p>
<p>Groups don&#8217;t breed, individuals do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
